Category Archives: City Review

Bicycle Amenities in Burlington, VT

Cruising around the streets of Burlington a few weekends ago, we spotted these interesting city-installed bi

Street Parking Burlington

Street Parking Burlington

cycle amenities:

  •  One of several “take back the streets” bicycle parking racks which occupies the same space as one standard motor vehicle parking place.  As shown, the bicycle is completely sheltered by the rack and is not locked up on the sidewalk.  In a bicycle-heavy, tightly packed city with narrow sidewalks like Burlington, off-the-sidewalk bicycle parking is a real benefit.  (Curiously, a scooter operator took advantage of this rack.)
  • A share- the-road sign that really communicates to both cyclists and motor vehicle operators.

    Share the Rd Burlington

    Share the Rd Burlington

Leave a comment

Filed under City Review, Comings and Goings, Local Bike Rides

Albany Bicycle Coalition Supports Hudson River Bikeway over the Livingston Avenue Bridge – Corning Preserve/BoatLauch

Livingston Ave. Bridge - Open

Livingston Ave. Bridge - Open

We were pleased to see growing momentum for returning the Livingston Avenue Rail Road Bridge to its original configuration combining train, bicycle, and pedestrian travel over the Hudson. Albany Bicycle Coalition has joined with the Livingston Ave. Rail Road Bridge Coalition  and others to support this effort.

As reported in Albany Times Union  (1/28/12), Mike Stammel, Rensselaer County legislator, is proposing legislation to give a push to his side of the river.

What are we doing on the west bank?

Bryan Fitzgerald, TU Staff writer reported that Mr. Stammel will introduce a resolution to restore a walkway on the Bridge. For reference, this will connect directly to the Mohawk-Hudson Bike-Hike Trail facilitating access to Albnay, Troy, Watervliet, and points north and south as well as opening up Rensselaer County to recreational and commuter riders.  This is not asking for anything new as the bridge always had a walkway.  The dilapidated walk/bikeway closed in the early 1990s.  Reopening the bridge to cyclists and pedestrians will draw tourists.  The rotating bridge was built in 1866 and rebuilt in 1901.

A project to replace the bridge has been in the works for years, but has stalled over lack of funding.

Leave a comment

Filed under Activism, City Review, Press Release, Support the Cause

City’s Request for Proposal to Refurbish Madison Avenue

The president of the Albany Bicycle Coalition (ABC), Lorenz Worden, sent me an email the other day which states,

Cyclists,

Word has it that there were responses to the city on the RFP [request for proposal] for the traffic study for “traffic calming” on Madison.  One more successful step . . .

Traffic Calming, Madison Ave, responses to the city, RFP… WTF?

I quickly jumped to the phone to ask Worden questions.  He told me that there is a committee of people called the Madison Avenue Traffic Calming Committee (MATCC), which he is a part of. MATCC is calling on the City of Albany to refurbish Madison Ave between Lark St and S. Allen St onto Western Ave until Manning Blvd.

The committee asks the city to reduce the number of lanes from four to two, install a third (middle) lane which may be used as a turning lane or emergency lane for quick response teams, an overhaul of the Madison and Western split at S. Allen, and amenities for cycling (bike lanes – yes please!) according to Virginia Hammer the ADHOC Chair of the MATCC.

MATCC lane removal request.

The project description from the City of Albany’s RFP states that the project, “is to determine the most effective multi-modal lane configuration for the Madison Avenue corridor between Lark Street and S. Allen Street as well as Western Avenue between S. Allen Street and Manning Boulevard.”

The city’s RFP asks bidding firms to be able to produce three traffic calming options.  “[The chosen firm] shall identify and evaluate a minimum of three (3) alternatives and recommend the best lane striping, signage and traffic signal treatments for this corridor.  The study must be based upon sound data and information on peak hourly/daily traffic distribution, street geometry, traffic signal operation, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle travel for Madison Avenue and its intersecting roadways.” This means that if traffic calming measures are installed- they may be separate from what the MATCC currently asks.

The city is clearly listening.

The RTP says, “All alternatives shall include and use potential options for traffic including but not limited to lane reduction or reassignment, improving motor vehicle safety, improving pedestrian access and safety, and improving/adding bicycle amenities on this corridor.”

Hammer says the projected cost of the study is near one hundred thousand dollars, funded by both the city of Albany and MATCC. MATCC procured approximately thirty thousand dollars from various entities. Worden says some of MATCC’s funds for the project have come from St. Rose College and Price Chopper.  The remaining seventy thousand from the city.

Possible redevelopment of split between Madison Ave and Western Ave.

Worden says that Madison Ave, “is a well known disaster zone,” “…with more  accidents in lower volume, compared to less accidents in more volume of Western Ave.”

The following firms have submitted proposals in response to the City’s RFP for Engineering Services – Madison Avenue Traffic Study/Road Diet Feasibility Study according to Hammer.

    • Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.
    • CHA Companies
    • Creighton Manning Engineering
    • Laberge Group
    • WSP – Sells
    • Barton & Loguidice P.C

    The initiative to redevelop the stretch between Lark and Manning is spear headed by the Madison Avenue Traffic Calming Committee, which is chaired by Virginia Hammer of the Pine Hill Neighborhood Association.

    The City of Albany’s Request for Proposal.

    The Pine Hills Neighborhood Association’s Powerpoint on Refurbishing Madison Ave.

    Leave a comment

    Filed under Activism, Article, City Review

    Bicyclist May Not Use Full Lane

    I wish I had better news. On this blog we bring you bicycle related news about events that happen around Albany. There is not a whole lot of it so we try to supplement those days with fun facts or interesting stories. Now I finally get something to share and it’s bad news. Charles F. Kettering once said, “Problems are the price of progress. Don’t bring me anything but trouble. Good news weakens me.” So in the name of “progress” here it is:

    “Section 9B.06 Bicycles May Use Full Lane Sign (R4-11)

    DELETE entire section; the R4-11 sign shall not be used in New York, as its message is not an accurate reflection of Section 1234 of the New York State Vehicle and Traffic Law, and could mislead inexperienced bicyclists into occupying inappropriate, and unsafe, positions within a roadway. On roadways where space is limited and interactions between motorists and bicyclists have proven problematic, it is preferable to either provide positive guidance to bicyclists in the form of Shared Lane Markings (see Section 9C.07) and/or warning to motorists in the form of the SHARE THE ROAD (W16-1P) plaque (see Section 2B.19).”

    Basically they are taking down the “Bicyclists may use full lane” signs because “interactions between motorists and bicyclists have proven problematic.” Okay fine, take the signs down, but what are you going to replace them with? What is the better solution? Oh wait, you don’t have one? WELL THEN LEAVE THE SIGNS UP! You don’t change something unless you have an alternative ready to go! What, you think the “share the road” signs are helpful? Tell me, what part of the road are we supposed to be sharing, and how much space does each vehicle get? Can cars pass me at 1 foot or 3 feet? Can I take the entire lane if I need too? Do I have to pull over for cars if they want to pass me?

    You can see where “share the road” is a lot more confusing then “bicyclist may use full lane.” At least the latter gives you a definite amount of space you may occupy and tells drivers to take a chill pill because we belong here too. It leaves no room for debate on how much you should share. Full lane can only mean full lane. Shared lane is ambiguous and dangerous if a novice cyclist and driver are sharing the same lane.

    I hear all the time that “bicycling is so dangerous” and “I don’t ride because I don’t want to get hit by cars.” You know why public opinion is so anti-bike? It is because of things like this. Share the road. You might as well be saying, “Cars, the road is yours to share so give a little of it to the lowly cyclists.”

    Angrily Written by Chris Belsole

    5 Comments

    Filed under Activism, Article, City Review, Editorial

    City Review: DC

    As you could probably guess from the previous post, I am in DC this weekend, and before you ask I did bring my bike. Did I get to ride around? No, but I did some extensive walking and saw some of the great bike infrastructure that DC has to offer.

    I did not see any sharrows, but the separated lanes and the signs that said that bikes were allowed on the road defiantly made up for it. Also I got the sense from the bikers riding through the crowds at the rally that bikers here are comfortable riding with the pedestrians.

    The one good thing that Albany has in common with DC is that both cities are very small and easily bikeable. In fact there are bikes that you can rent by the hour and tour around the city.

    After being here for a day and touring the capital and the monuments I am defiantly coming back for more. The paths around the monuments and the river trail all look like they will be amazing to bike down. DC is now on my list of places that I want to bike around once I my life.

    Written by Chris Belsole

    Leave a comment

    Filed under Article, City Review