Category Archives: Activism

City’s Request for Proposal to Refurbish Madison Avenue

The president of the Albany Bicycle Coalition (ABC), Lorenz Worden, sent me an email the other day which states,

Cyclists,

Word has it that there were responses to the city on the RFP [request for proposal] for the traffic study for “traffic calming” on Madison.  One more successful step . . .

Traffic Calming, Madison Ave, responses to the city, RFP… WTF?

I quickly jumped to the phone to ask Worden questions.  He told me that there is a committee of people called the Madison Avenue Traffic Calming Committee (MATCC), which he is a part of. MATCC is calling on the City of Albany to refurbish Madison Ave between Lark St and S. Allen St onto Western Ave until Manning Blvd.

The committee asks the city to reduce the number of lanes from four to two, install a third (middle) lane which may be used as a turning lane or emergency lane for quick response teams, an overhaul of the Madison and Western split at S. Allen, and amenities for cycling (bike lanes – yes please!) according to Virginia Hammer the ADHOC Chair of the MATCC.

MATCC lane removal request.

The project description from the City of Albany’s RFP states that the project, “is to determine the most effective multi-modal lane configuration for the Madison Avenue corridor between Lark Street and S. Allen Street as well as Western Avenue between S. Allen Street and Manning Boulevard.”

The city’s RFP asks bidding firms to be able to produce three traffic calming options.  “[The chosen firm] shall identify and evaluate a minimum of three (3) alternatives and recommend the best lane striping, signage and traffic signal treatments for this corridor.  The study must be based upon sound data and information on peak hourly/daily traffic distribution, street geometry, traffic signal operation, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle travel for Madison Avenue and its intersecting roadways.” This means that if traffic calming measures are installed- they may be separate from what the MATCC currently asks.

The city is clearly listening.

The RTP says, “All alternatives shall include and use potential options for traffic including but not limited to lane reduction or reassignment, improving motor vehicle safety, improving pedestrian access and safety, and improving/adding bicycle amenities on this corridor.”

Hammer says the projected cost of the study is near one hundred thousand dollars, funded by both the city of Albany and MATCC. MATCC procured approximately thirty thousand dollars from various entities. Worden says some of MATCC’s funds for the project have come from St. Rose College and Price Chopper.  The remaining seventy thousand from the city.

Possible redevelopment of split between Madison Ave and Western Ave.

Worden says that Madison Ave, “is a well known disaster zone,” “…with more  accidents in lower volume, compared to less accidents in more volume of Western Ave.”

The following firms have submitted proposals in response to the City’s RFP for Engineering Services – Madison Avenue Traffic Study/Road Diet Feasibility Study according to Hammer.

    • Greenman-Pedersen, Inc.
    • CHA Companies
    • Creighton Manning Engineering
    • Laberge Group
    • WSP – Sells
    • Barton & Loguidice P.C

    The initiative to redevelop the stretch between Lark and Manning is spear headed by the Madison Avenue Traffic Calming Committee, which is chaired by Virginia Hammer of the Pine Hill Neighborhood Association.

    The City of Albany’s Request for Proposal.

    The Pine Hills Neighborhood Association’s Powerpoint on Refurbishing Madison Ave.

    Leave a comment

    Filed under Activism, Article, City Review

    What is People for Bikes?

    image

    People for Bikes

    You may have noticed cute flyers around town, specifically at the Albany Downtube. The front resembles a smiling face drawn with a bike in mind. Well those flyers are from People for Bikes, a growing initiation from Bike Belong for the public advocacy of bicycles.

    People for Bikes is dedicated to channeling the passion we all share  for the bicycles that keep us fit, get us to our destinations, keep the roads less congested, and help save the earth by saving gas and keeping the air fresh. They are our vehicle to a healthier world, excitement, and adventure. From “who we are.”

    People for Bikes wants to gather a million signatures to use as leverage for the support of bicycles. With one unified voice, People for Bikes can speak to law makers, the media, and the public to let them know that here in this great nation, bicycles are loved. From “goals

    Please join the effort to help promote and provide a bike friendly United States. Below is part of the message I received after I contributed my voice to the goal of one million signature.

    “Thanks for signing the peopleforbikes.org pledge. We’re now one person closer to uniting one million voices for the future of bicycling.

    Your voice will help build a national movement with clout and influence. Our unified message – that bicycling is important and should be supported – will resonate with leaders, the media and the public. We’ll work to ensure that new, cost-effective investments are made in bicycling facilities such as bikes lanes, trails, bike-share programs, and more that will benefit us now and well into the future.”

    People for Bikes

    Leave a comment

    Filed under Activism, Support the Cause

    Oh Sweet Innovation – BKME

    Ah BKME, sweet innovative activism!

    Bike Lanes from Casey Neistat on Vimeo.

    Bicycles are a great means of transportation – they run on fat and save you cash, opposed from their counter parts which run on cash and make you fat! They are welcome in  cities all across the world. City planners in Portland, Amsterdam, Seattle, New York City and even here in Albany have incorporated encoraging bicycle lanes into their designs. This is great, until motor vehicles start to use bicycle lanes as their parking spots! Luckly we are we have smart people on our side.

    Here’s one innovation we could use for evidence to encourage bicycle boulevards.  It’s called BKME. If we were to document all the hazards along the bike lanes in Albany, which there are many, this may go a long way to convince planners that bicycle boulevards would be a safe design. Another note – some of our main streets don’t have bike lanes… what happened to safety first?

    From BKME.org

    Image from The Bird Wheel

    About la velolución

    BKME.ORG is a platform that channels the power of cyclists to reclaim bikelanes from vehicles.

    We use #BKME on Twitter to collectively defend our bikelanes in realtime, everywhere.

    Join the Velolucion.

    Who We Are

    We are cyclists in NYC.These bikelanes belong exclusively to us.We are determined to defend them to stay alive.

    This is why we made bkme.org, as a way to authorize urban access for us all.Think of it as an Open Data platform for collectively recording each violation against our bikelanes, socially in real time.

    We are all connected and we must participate in this revolution together.Starting now we always bike together.Join us and defend your bikelane.

    This is just the beginning.Viva la Velolución.

    Interested?

    Keep in mind we are in super alpha but we are working hard to make BKME even better.

    Here is how to join in:

    Whether on bike or on foot, Use your mobile device and take a photo of the offending vehicle, take down the license plate andtweet it all to #bkme with your GPS location enabled (here’s how toget a Twitter account and activate geolocation on your device).

    We are working on some really cool ideas for the future.To stay current, follow us at @bkme_ny.

    Have a comment or suggestions, want to go for a ride? Awesome! We would love to hear from you! Send us an email at us@bkme.org

    Yours,The BKME Community

    I also want to note that I went through NYS transportation laws. I was unable to find any law prohibiting parking in bicycle lanes by motor vehicles. Here are the laws.

    Leave a comment

    Filed under Activism, Bicycle Boulevards

    US Proposes Law to Force Cyclists Off the Road

    The Senate’s transportation authorization has drafted the S. 1813 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act that if passed, would force cyclists to paths and trails parallel to all roads in national parks and other federal lands. Yes – new law that forces cyclists off the road.

    Are you kidding me?!

    The Section § 203 (d) (p. 226) says,

    “(d) BICYCLE SAFETY.—The Secretary of the appropriate Federal land management agency shall prohibit the use of bicycles on each federally owned road that has a speed limit of 30 miles per hour or greater and an adjacent paved path for use by bicycles within 100 yards of the road.”

    Andy Clarke, the President of the League of American Bicyclists (LAB) says,

    “The problem with the provision is that the restriction applies regardless of the quality, safety, and utility of the path provided; it disregards cyclists need the roadway to reach shops, services etc.; and ignores our fundamental right to the road.”

    Answering why this proposed provision, Clarke says,

    “One such idea is that it’s just not safe for cyclists to sharing the road with cars going more than 30 mph and thus, for our own safety, we should have to use the provided path. This paternalistic (at best) approach is guilty of not only blaming the victim but simply doesn’t make sense unless every higher-speed roadway has a path alongside it.

    The second principle at play is the idea that “we provided this path for you, you’d darned well better use it”. To which our response should be…if the path is any good, you shouldn’t have to force anyone to use it; they will use it voluntarily because it works. Our communities are replete with examples of poorly designed, built and maintained paths that are little more than glorified sidewalks. “

    One blogger brings up a meaningful point. Michael Frank of Adventure Journal says, “just code for a screaming headline, ‘Mountain Biker Takes out Iowa Mom on Grand Teton Walking Path'”.

    This provision would affect 22 national parks in New York State according to the National Park Service. This includes sites from New York City, into the Appalachian Mountains and  many others. Who’s to say this law won’t spill over into state parks? How will we get to food and service shops on the roads? What about road cyclists?

    Are we going to let law makers force us cyclists off all US national park roads?

    To remove the provision that would force cyclists off national park roads there is a petition, the League of American Bicyclists have started with over 12,500 signatures thus far. Sign the petition. The petition tells, “the Senate that the mandatory side path law is a bad idea.” If this law passes, we are supplying a deterrent against bicycling.

    Join the effort to keep us on the road by signing the petition.

    KEEP US ON THE ROAD!

    SIGN THE LEAGUE OF AMERICAN CYCLIST’S PETITION TO REMOVE SECTION § 203 (d)

    OR

    WRITE YOUR SENATOR A LETTER 

    The League of American Bicyclists represents 57 million cyclists with 300,000 members, 25,000 individuals and 700 organizations. LAB works for better bicycling.


    Leave a comment

    Filed under Activism, Law

    What are Bicycle Boulevards?

    And how can we bring one to Albany?

    At our monthly meeting on November 17, 2011 Ken B. brought up bicycle boulevards. This got me thinking. I’ve come up with a few questions to help us understand bicycle boulevards a bit better.

    What are bicycle boulevards?

    “Bicycle boulevards are low-volume and low-speed streets that  have been optimized for bicycle travel through treatments such as traffic calming and traffic  reduction, signage and pavement markings, and intersection crossing treatments,” according to Portland University’s Fundamentals of Bicycle Boulevard Planning and Design. 

    What is the purpose of a bicycle boulevard?

    “The purpose of a bicycle boulevard is to improve bicycle safety and circulation, by providing cyclists a designated travel route as an alternative to or as a companion route to using lanes on higher motor vehicle volume streets,” according to a report prepared by Alliant Engineering, Inc for the City of Minneapolis.

    Who use bicycle boulevards? 

    Cyclist and non motor vehicle users all over the world.

    Do they work? 

    Yes. Among the eight case studies included in the Fundamentals of Bicycle Boulevard Planning and Design, Portland University found that bike boulevards are, “well-loved in each community,” and that, “nearly all representatives indicated that they have plans for additional bicycle boulevards.” Further, by using bicycle boulevard planning in San Luis Obispo, planners have lowered  traffic volumes from three hundred forty five to seventy five cars in one two hour count. If the idea is to create safer routes for cyclists, bicycle boulevards work.

    How can we create a bike boulevard in Albany?

    Five broad elements are included in Portland University’s fundamentals for bicycle boulevard design: traffic calming, signage, traffic reduction, intersection treatment, and prioritized travel.

    Albany could easily construct a bicycle boulevard using signage. Signs are easily designed, constructed, are cheap, and can be put up in a day. There are plenty of cyclists who know alternative routes to the busy arteries: Central, Washington, Western, and Madison. They are willing and able to help design and implement a bicycle boulevard here in Albany.

    I would personally like to see these boulevards constructed. The main arteries are too dangerous. I have lived in Albany for nearly five years and ride nearly everyday. I have been hit by a car four times in my life. Four times. Three of which were on Central Avenue.

    [image from streetblog.org]

    In all, what does this mean?

    1. It means that bicycle boulevards are designed to make a community safer.
    2. It means bicycle boulevards can be constructed as easily as posting a few signs.
    3. It means by constructed bicycle boulevards, a community is showing its members that cycling is a viable source of transportation and recreation.

     Here’s a great video to explain bicycle boulevards from StreetFilms.org

    More Information:

    Fundamentals of Bicycle Boulevard Planning and Design. 

    A ‘How To’ by UC Berkeley

    Alta Planning and Design builds boulevards

    Written by Daniel Patterson

    7 Comments

    Filed under Activism, Bicycle Boulevards